India Seeks Additional Time to Secure Consular Access for UAE Detainee

India Seeks Additional Time to Secure Consular Access for UAE Detainee.webp

New Delhi, February 17 – The Delhi High Court on Tuesday postponed the hearing in the case concerning the arrest of retired Major Vikrant Jaitly in the UAE, after the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) requested four weeks to arrange the next consular meeting with him.

A single-judge bench of Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav was hearing a petition filed by Jaitly’s sister, Bollywood actress Celina Jaitly, who claimed that her brother had been "illegally abducted and detained" in the United Arab Emirates and sought legal representation and consular access for him.

During the hearing, Justice Kaurav was informed by the Centre that the proposed meeting with Jaitly could not be held on February 13.

The Delhi High Court was informed that although the Indian Embassy in Abu Dhabi had sought consular access to Jaitly on that date, the request was not approved by the UAE authorities, and the next date of the meeting is awaited.

The Union government sought three to four weeks' time to enable the MEA and the Indian Embassy to pursue the matter through diplomatic channels and seek cooperation from the UAE authorities.

Observing that "this request seems reasonable," the Delhi High Court said that there was "no reason to keep the matter on a weekly basis" and postponed the hearing to March 16.

It also took note of the submission that the MEA had requested the Union Ministry of Law and Justice to examine the possible invocation of the India-UAE Mutual Legal Assistance Agreement on judicial matters and to consider sending a formal request to the UAE central authority to facilitate a virtual interaction between the Delhi High Court and Jaitly.

During the hearing, the lawyer representing Jaitly’s wife, Charul Jaitly, sought to be included as a party and submitted a written note detailing certain developments in the case.

After reviewing the note, Justice Kaurav observed: "If this is the case, give it to the other side, let them review it and understand the grievance against them. There is nothing confidential."

When the wife’s lawyer sought a closed-door hearing, the judge declined, stating: "I don't want to turn this into a family issue. This is a writ petition against the Union of India."

The petitioner (Celina Jaitly) was granted the liberty to file a response note.

The Delhi High Court also directed that parties shall not interact with the media without its permission.

Celina Jaitly had moved the Delhi High Court seeking assistance for her brother, claiming that the retired Indian Army officer, who had been residing in the UAE since 2016, was "illegally abducted and detained" in September 2024, and sought directions for consular access and legal aid.
 
Tags Tags
abu dhabi embassy celina jaitly charul jaitly consular access delhi high court diplomatic channels india-uae mutual legal assistance agreement legal representation ministry of external affairs petition retirement uae united arab emirates vikrant jaitly writ petition
Back
Top