New Delhi, April 6 Rajya Sabha Chairman C P Radhakrishnan and Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla on Monday rejected separate notices from the opposition to move a motion for the removal of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar from his post.
The opposition had submitted the notices to the Lok Sabha Speaker and the Rajya Sabha Chairman against the CEC in March, listing seven charges, including alleged "partisan and discriminatory conduct in office," "deliberate obstruction of investigation of electoral fraud" and "mass disenfranchisement".
In separate orders, the Speaker and the Rajya Sabha Chairman refused to admit the notices moved under Article 324(5) of the Constitution, along with other relevant constitutional and statutory provisions, seeking the removal of Gyanesh Kumar as the Chief Election Commissioner.
"After due consideration of the motion and a careful and objective assessment of all relevant aspects and issues involved, the Chairman, Rajya Sabha, in exercise of the powers vested in him under Section 3 of the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968, has refused to admit the said motion," a notification from the Rajya Sabha Secretary General said.
It stated that the motion, dated March 12, 2026, signed by 63 members of the Rajya Sabha under Article 324(5) of the Constitution, read with Article 124(4) thereof, Section 11(2) of the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023 and the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968, was submitted to the Rajya Sabha Chairman.
A separate notification from the Lok Sabha Secretary General said that a motion, dated March 12, 2026, signed by 130 Members of Lok Sabha under Article 324(5) of the Constitution, was submitted to the Speaker, seeking the removal of Gyanesh Kumar, Chief Election Commissioner.
"After due consideration of the motion and a careful and objective assessment of all relevant aspects and issues involved therein, the Hon'ble Speaker, Lok Sabha, in exercise of the powers vested in him under Section 3 of the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968, has refused to admit the said motion," it said.
Article 324(5) of the Constitution states that the CEC shall not be removed from office except in the same manner and on the same grounds as a judge of the Supreme Court, and the conditions of service of the CEC shall not be varied to his disadvantage after his appointment.
Reacting to the rejection of the notice, Congress leader Jairam Ramesh said, "We know what happened to the last Chairman of the Rajya Sabha who accepted a petition moved by Opposition MPs".
Ramesh's statement on X was an apparent reference to Jagdeep Dhankhar, who suddenly resigned as Vice President in July 2025, citing health reasons.
TMC leader Derek O'Brien said that no reason has been given while rejecting the opposition's notices and accused the BJP of mocking Parliament.
"Ah! Told you so. Notice to remove CEC Vanish Kumar by Rajya Sabha MPs rejected. Reason? NO REASON GIVEN. BJP keep mocking our great Parliament. SHAME," O'Brien said in a post on X.
The opposition parties have accused the CEC of aiding the ruling BJP on several occasions, especially with the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls.
The process for removing the CEC is similar to that for the removal of a Supreme Court or a high court judge, meaning an impeachment can only be effected on the ground of "proven misbehaviour or incapacity".
The signatories to the notices included the Congress, Trinamool Congress, DMK, RJD and Left parties, which are all part of the opposition INDIA bloc, besides the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), which is no longer formally in the alliance. Some Independent MPs had also signed the notices.
This was the first time a notice was moved seeking the removal of the CEC.
The motion for removal may be introduced in either House of Parliament and must be passed by a special majority -- a majority of the total membership of the House and a two-thirds majority of the members present and voting.