POCSO Case Against Swami Linked to Attempt to Suppress Epstein Files Discussion

POCSO Case Against Swami Linked to Attempt to Suppress Epstein Files Discussion.webp

Varanasi/Prayagraj (UP), February 26 Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati, who has been accused of sexually abusing two individuals, claimed on Thursday that the "false case" is being used to defame him and divert public attention in India from the globally discussed "Epstein files".

The spiritual leader has already filed a petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking anticipatory bail in the case registered against him. The hearing will take place on Friday.

Avimukteshwaranand, who is named in an FIR lodged at the Jhunsi police station under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act and relevant sections of the BNS, claimed that "discussion around the Epstein files, which is taking place around the world, is not happening in India".

"Here, by bringing out a false case against the Shankaracharya, an attempt is being made to suppress the discussion on the Epstein files," he told reporters in Varanasi.

The FIR against Avimukteshwaranand and his disciple Mukundanand Brahmachari was lodged over allegations of sexual abuse of two individuals, including a minor, over the past year. The complainants include Ashutosh Brahmachari alias Ashutosh Pandey and two others.

ACP (Jhunsi) Vimal Kishore Mishra told

The seer said he has filed a complaint against the accuser, Ashutosh Brahmachari, under the POCSO Act, pointing out that Section 22 of the Act permits legal action in cases of false complaints.

Responding to questions about television channels airing statements of the alleged victims, the seer raised objections over what he termed "procedural lapses". "If a case is registered under the POCSO Act, the identity of the complainants must remain confidential. How were their identities leaked?" he asked.

"Statements of children are supposed to be recorded as part of legal proceedings. How are such statements being shown on a TV channel even before court proceedings?"

Avimukteshwaranand also questioned the authenticity of the statements aired, saying that in one of the clips, a child referred to "Kashi Jyotirmath".

"There is no Jyotirmath in Kashi. Jyotirmath is in Uttarakhand, where I am the Shankaracharya. This makes it clear that they were coached and their statements were prepared before being presented to the media," he alleged.

He accused certain media outlets of acting in haste to malign him. "The kind of hurry being shown by the TV channel proves that no opportunity is to be missed to defame the Shankaracharya," the seer alleged.

Asked why he had moved court for anticipatory bail if he had nothing to fear, the seer said that as Shankaracharya of Jyotirmath, he represents an institution and not merely an individual.

"As Shankaracharya, I am an institution in myself. It is my responsibility to protect the faith of the followers associated with this institution. That is why the decision was taken to apply for anticipatory bail," he said.

Referring to allegations linked to the recent Magh Mela period, he reiterated that his movements were captured on CCTV cameras and by the media, and claimed that the boys concerned never studied at his gurukul nor had they taken admission there.

"If anything wrong has happened with those children, it must have been done by those who were with them. We had no contact with them. If someone wants to fabricate a story, they can concoct anything," he said.
 
Tags Tags
allahabad high court anticipatory bail ashutosh brahmachari avimukteshwaranand saraswati epstein files gurukul jhunsi police station magh mela media reporting prayagraj protection of children from sexual offences (pocso) act sexual abuse allegations shankaracharya uttar pradesh varanasi
Back
Top