New Delhi, April 2 Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge has told a Delhi court that a revision petition challenging the dismissal of a plea seeking an FIR against him is an abuse of the law, as mere criticism of a political ideology has vaguely been categorized as "hate speech" and...
article19(1)(a)
congress party
criminal complaint
delhi court
fir complaint
freedom of speech
hate speech
karnataka election
legal proceedings
magisterial court
mallikarjun kharge
narendra modi
political criticism
political ideology
revision petition
Srinagar, March 4 CPI(M) leader M Y Tarigami expressed concern on Wednesday over alleged restrictions on several established media organizations in Kashmir after their social media pages were reportedly taken down.Referring to reports that certain news outlets' pages were taken down following...
article19(1)(a)
cpi(m)
freedom of press
iran
jammu and kashmir
junaid azim mattu
kashmir
m y tarigami
media restrictions
misinformation
protests
ruhullah mehdi
social media
srinagar police
us-israel strikes
New Delhi, February 27 Supreme Court Judge Justice B.V. Nagarathna on Friday said that the media cannot perform its role under constraint, fear, or influence, and the most serious threats to press freedom arise not from direct censorship but from regulations, ownership rules, licensing laws, and...
article19(1)(a)
article19(1)(g)
constitutional law
economic policy
editorial independence
freedom of speech
great nicobar island
india
ipi india award
journalism
media
news media
press freedom
regulations
scroll.in
supreme court of india
New Delhi, February 25 Observing that fraternity is a critical element for national unity and social cohesion, the Supreme Court has said that public figures holding high constitutional offices cannot target any particular community based on religion, language, caste, or region.The top court...
article19(1)(a)
article19(2)
community relations
constitutional preamble
constitutional rights
freedom of speech
ghooskhor pandat
india
national unity
neeraj pandey
netflix
public figures
religious tolerance
social cohesion
supreme court of india
New Delhi, February 19 Criticism of the government, as long as it does not incite violence, was completely permitted in a democracy and cannot be used to justify invoking the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), the Foundation for Media Professionals contended before the Delhi High Court...
amitabha pande
anticipatory bail
article19(1)(a)
association for protection of civil rights (apcr)
bail
criminal justice
criticism of government
delhi high court
disaffection
foundation for media professionals
freedom of speech
india
journalism
police case diary
sajal awasthi
uapa
unlawful activities (prevention) act