article 19(1)(a)

  1. A

    Delhi HC Seeks Centre's Response to Transgender Law Amendment

    New Delhi, April 8 The Delhi High Court on Wednesday sought the Centre's response to two petitions challenging provisions of the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Act, 2026, which removes the right to self-perceived gender identity.A bench of Chief Justice D K Upadhyaya and...
  2. K

    Court Hearing Dispute Over Kharge's Political Criticism

    New Delhi, April 2 Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge has told a Delhi court that a revision petition challenging the dismissal of a plea seeking an FIR against him is an abuse of the law, as mere criticism of a political ideology has vaguely been categorized as "hate speech" and...
  3. P

    CPI(M) Leader Raises Concerns Over Media Restrictions in Kashmir

    Srinagar, March 4 CPI(M) leader M Y Tarigami expressed concern on Wednesday over alleged restrictions on several established media organizations in Kashmir after their social media pages were reportedly taken down.Referring to reports that certain news outlets' pages were taken down following...
  4. V

    Navigating Press Freedom: Regulations, Ownership, and the Future of Journalism

    New Delhi, February 27 Supreme Court Judge Justice B.V. Nagarathna on Friday said that the media cannot perform its role under constraint, fear, or influence, and the most serious threats to press freedom arise not from direct censorship but from regulations, ownership rules, licensing laws, and...
  5. S

    Constitutional Duty to Promote Fraternity, Says Supreme Court

    New Delhi, February 25 Observing that fraternity is a critical element for national unity and social cohesion, the Supreme Court has said that public figures holding high constitutional offices cannot target any particular community based on religion, language, caste, or region.The top court...
  6. S

    UAPA Provisions Under Scrutiny: Freedom of Speech at Stake

    New Delhi, February 19 Criticism of the government, as long as it does not incite violence, was completely permitted in a democracy and cannot be used to justify invoking the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), the Foundation for Media Professionals contended before the Delhi High Court...
Back
Top