New Delhi, April 9 – The Union government reiterated before the Supreme Court on Thursday that the restrictions at the Sabarimala temple are not based on gender discrimination, arguing that several temples across the country impose practices that are either male- or female-centric, based on...
constitutional law
denominational temples
gender equality
india
justice surya kant
kerala
religious beliefs
religious freedom
religious practices
sabarimalatemple
solicitor general
supreme court of india
temple entry
temple restrictions
tradition
New Delhi, April 9 The Supreme Court observed on Thursday that Hinduism would be negatively affected and society would be divided if temples and "mutts" restricted entry based on sect and denominations within a religion.A nine-judge constitutional bench, headed by Chief Justice Surya Kant...
article 25(2)(b)
article 26(b)
constitutional law
denominationalism
gowda saraswat brahmins
hinduism
kerala
mutts
religious access
religious discrimination
religious freedom
religious practices
sabarimalatemple
supreme court of india
temples
venkataramana devaru judgment
New Delhi, April 9 Everyone should have access to all temples and "maths," and excluding a particular denomination will negatively affect Hinduism and divide society, the Supreme Court said on Thursday.The remark came from a nine-judge bench of the Constitution bench while hearing petitions...
access to religious sites
constitutional law
denominational temples
hinduism
kerala
public order
religious discrimination
religious freedom
religious law
religious practice
religious practice regulation
sabarimalatemple
supreme court of india
temples
venkataramana devaru
New Delhi, April 9 The Centre on Thursday backed the restriction on the entry of menstruating women into Kerala's Sabarimala temple, saying that the top court's 2018 judgment proceeds on the assumption that men are superior and women are on a lower pedestal.A nine-judge Constitution bench is...
additional solicitor general
chamayavilakku festival
constitution bench
constitutional law
court judgments
devi temple
discrimination against women
hinduism
kerala
menstruation
public morality
religious freedom
religious practice
sabarimalatemple
solicitor general
temple ban
New Delhi, April 8 The Indian Constitution does not allow judicial review based on "constitutional morality" to decide essential religious practices and beliefs, the Centre told the Supreme Court on Wednesday. The Centre emphasized that previous verdicts on decriminalizing consensual gay sex and...
adultery
article 25
article 26
constitutional morality
hindu law
indian constitution
judicial review
public morality
religious discrimination
religious freedom
religious practices
sabarimalatemple
same-sex relationships
solicitor general of india
supreme court of india
New Delhi, April 8 The Supreme Court on Wednesday asked the Centre how people who are not devotees of Lord Ayyappa could challenge the customs of the Sabarimala temple in Kerala.The remark was made by a nine-judge Constitution bench hearing petitions related to discrimination against women at...
bench of nine
constitutional law
indian young lawyers association
judicial process
kerala
legal services authority
lord ayyappa
pil jurisdiction
public interest litigation
religious discrimination
religious freedom
religious practices
sabarimalatemple
supreme court of india
temple customs
New Delhi, April 8 The Centre told the Supreme Court on Wednesday that the two landmark judgments decriminalizing adultery and same-sex consensual relationships were based on a subjective interpretation of "constitutional morality" and should be declared as "not a good law".This submission was...
constitutional law
constitutional morality
doctrine of separation of powers
indian constitution
indian penal code
joseph shine case
judicial review
legal scholarship
navtej singh johar case
nivedita menon
religious discrimination
religious freedom
sabarimalatemple
section 377
section 497
supreme court of india
New Delhi, April 8 The Supreme Court on Wednesday observed that it has the right and jurisdiction to determine what is a superstitious practice in a religion.This came in response to the Centre's submission that a secular court cannot decide the issue, as judges are experts in the field of...
article 25(2)(b)
black act
constitution bench
constitutional law
discrimination against women
indian law
judicial review
nagaland
religion
religious freedom
religious practice
sabarimalatemple
superstition
supreme court
witchcraft
Important cases listed before the Supreme Court on Wednesday, April 8:* A nine-judge Supreme Court bench will hear pleas seeking review of the decision allowing women to enter the Sabarimala temple.* The Supreme Court will hear a plea seeking directions to the Centre and state governments to...
aarey forest
biometric voting
constitutional law
court cases
election commission of india
forestry
india
judicial service
land disputes
legal issues
revenue service cadres
sabarimalatemple
shanti act
supreme court
tree felling
New Delhi, April 7 – Urging the Supreme Court to reconsider the 2018 Sabarimala judgment permitting entry of women of all age groups into the temple, the Union government told a nine-judge Constitution Bench on Tuesday that notions of “patriarchy” and “gender stereotypes” are alien to Indian...
article 26
ayyappa temple
constituent assembly
constitutional law
denominational rights
gender equality
india
judicial review
legal interpretation
patriarchy
religious freedom
religious practices
sabarimalatemple
supreme court of india
women's rights
New Delhi, April 7 The Centre vehemently argued before the Supreme Court that the issue of restricting the entry of women aged between 10 and 50 years into the Sabarimala temple falls within the domain of religious faith and denominational autonomy, and is beyond the scope of judicial review.A...
age restrictions
article 17
article 25
constitution bench
constitutional law
denominational autonomy
discrimination against women
essential religious practices
hindu law
judicial review
kerala
menstruation
religious freedom
religious practice
sabarimalatemple
supreme court of india
untouchability
New Delhi, April 7 The Centre told the Supreme Court on Tuesday that the 2018 Sabarimala judgment, which lifted the ban on women aged 10-50 entering the Sabarimala temple in Kerala, was wrongly decided and requires reconsideration.Appearing before a nine-judge bench headed by Chief Justice of...
article 17 constitution
constitution bench
constitutional law
gender discrimination
hindu law
india
judicial review
religious freedom
religious practice
sabarimalatemple
sui generis
supreme court
surya kant
tushar mehta
women's rights
New Delhi, April 7 A woman cannot be treated as "untouchable" for three days in a month and then cease to be considered untouchable on the fourth day, Supreme Court judge B.V. Nagarathna remarked on Tuesday.The remark came while a nine-judge bench was hearing petitions related to...
age restriction
article 17 constitution
constitutional law
discrimination
gender equality
hinduism
india
judicial review
kerala
legal precedent
religious freedom
religious practice
sabarimalatemple
supreme court of india
temple access
women's rights
Thiruvananthapuram, April 7 With the assembly elections just a day away, the BJP in Kerala on Tuesday criticized both the ruling LDF and the opposition UDF over their stance on the Sabarimala issue, accusing them of taking a "U-turn" on the entry of young women into the hill shrine.Addressing...
ayyappa devotees
congress
constitutional law
cpi(m)
criminal law
kerala assembly elections
ldf
legal cases
political criticism
rajeev chandrasekhar
religious faith
religious freedom
sabarimalatemple
supreme court of india
temple entry restrictions
udf
women's rights
Thiruvananthapuram, April 7 Congress leader Shashi Tharoor said on Tuesday that those interpreting the law must take faith into account, as he spoke about the Sabarimala women entry issue and the lessons learned from the controversy.Speaking to the media here, the Thiruvananthapuram MP said he...
ayyappa
constitutional law
faith
hinduism
india
kerala
ldf government
religious freedom
religious law
sabarimalatemple
shashi tharoor
supreme court
temple entry
New Delhi, April 7 The Centre on Tuesday told the Supreme Court that it supports the restriction on the entry of menstruating women into Kerala's Sabarimala temple, arguing that the issue falls squarely within the domain of religious faith and denominational autonomy, and lies beyond the scope...
constitution bench
constitutional review
denominational autonomy
hinduism
judicial review
kerala
pluralism
religious discrimination
religious freedom
religious practice
religious texts
sabarimalatemple
solicitor general
supreme court
tushar mehta
New Delhi, April 7 A nine-judge Supreme Court bench commenced hearings on petitions related to discrimination against women in religious places, including the Sabarimala temple of Kerala, and on the scope and extent of religious freedom practiced by multiple faiths.The Constitution bench...
article 25
article 26
bench referrals
constitutional law
court proceedings
denominational autonomy
discrimination against women
india
judicial review
kerala
religious freedom
religious law
religious practice
sabarimalatemple
supreme court
Important cases listed before the Supreme Court on Tuesday, April 7:* A nine-judge constitutional bench will hear pleas seeking review in the case related to the entry of women into the Sabarimala temple.* The Supreme Court will hear the plea of the Uttar Pradesh government in the case...
New Delhi, April 7 – As hearings begin on Tuesday, the Supreme Court has formally notified the constitution of a nine-judge Constitution Bench to take up the long-standing Sabarimala review matter.According to the cause list published for Tuesday on the apex court’s official website, the...
article 25
constitution bench
constitutional law
court schedule
india
legal proceedings
religious freedom
religious practice
review petition
sabarimalatemple
solicitor general
supreme court of india
temple law
travancore devaswom board
written submissions
New Delhi, April 4 – The Supreme Court has formally notified the constitution of a nine-judge Constitution Bench, which will commence hearing from April 7 in the long-pending Sabarimala review matter.According to the cause list published for April 7 on the apex court's official website, the...
article 25
constitution bench
constitutional law
court schedule
dawoodi bohra
india
legal proceedings
religious freedom
religious practices
review petition
sabarimalatemple
solicitor general
supreme court of india
temple access
travancore devaswom board